The weapon used by the gunman was officially registered, and he himself held the relevant permits. According to journalists’ reports, the man turned out to be a lieutenant-colonel in the Russian Armed Forces – a native of Moscow with Ukrainian citizenship – who, according to some sources, had made donations in support of the so-called ‘special military operation’. According to preliminary information, he had already attacked people in the same shop three years earlier. Neighbours say he moved into the building at the start of the full-scale invasion.

These facts form a chilling picture, but our task is not to inflame emotions – it is to try to answer, calmly and honestly, the questions that this tragedy inevitably poses to society, the law enforcement system and the rule of law.

WEAPONS, LICENCES AND THE ILLUSION OF SAFETY

The first and most obvious conclusion that springs to mind is that this crime was committed using a legally registered weapon. This is not a mere detail but a fundamentally important circumstance that undermines one of the central arguments of those lobbying for the free circulation of firearms: ‘Legal Weapons = Safety’.

The debate over the liberalisation of the firearms market in Ukraine has raged for years, but it intensified particularly in the context of the full-scale war, when a section of society and a number of lawmakers began insisting on enshrining the right to bear arms in the constitution, citing the need for self-defence and patriotic duty. The tragedy in Korsun polarised society at the time: many people sympathised with the man who had used a weapon against law enforcement officers – which in itself is symptomatic and alarming.

The current case is fundamentally different. Here there is no ‘people’s avenger’ or ‘Korsun Robin Hood’, nor is there any hint of social conflict with the system. There is a retired lieutenant-colonel who shoots peaceful supermarket shoppers with a legally registered pistol. It is precisely this circumstance that should settle the debate: not ‘who’ commits the crime or what their ideology is, but the fact that Ukraine’s system for issuing firearms licences is structurally incapable of filtering out those who harbour hidden destructive intentions. Screening during the registration of firearms has proved futile. Previous attacks on people in the same shop did not lead to the licence being revoked. The system failed.

Here, however, we must refrain from oversimplification. The people’s right to resist tyranny remains a fundamental principle of constitutional theory and international legal tradition. The question is not whether a citizen has the right to defend themselves, but whether the state is capable of responsibly managing the circulation of weapons in conditions of hybrid warfare, social trauma and the psychological instability of the population. The answer provided by this tragedy is – not yet.

NEGOTIATIONS, DE-ESCALATION AND COMMUNICATION FAILURE

For around 40 minutes, negotiators attempted to establish contact with the attacker, but he did not respond. “He did not make contact. I did not hear him,” noted the head of the negotiation unit at the Kyiv National Police.

This is a key detail that requires separate analysis. Forty minutes is both a long time and a short time. For negotiators, this is a relatively brief period in tactical terms. But the very fact of a complete lack of any response from the attacker indicates not only his pathological determination, but also a fundamental problem: were these forty minutes used with genuinely professional techniques for engaging a person in crisis? Does our police force even have the necessary level of training for negotiators capable of working with people who have crossed a psychological threshold?

Today, a dangerous mindset prevails among some Ukrainian police officers: ‘Shoot First – Sort It Out Later’. This mindset has gained further momentum in a wartime environment, where violence is normalised and the right to use force is interpreted far more broadly than provided for by law and human rights standards. The Kyiv tragedy, like many before it, risks becoming not a catalyst for reform but a confirmation of this flawed logic. Meanwhile, the ECtHR consistently emphasises that when assessing the lawfulness of the use of lethal force, account must be taken not only of the actions of the perpetrators but also of all the surrounding circumstances – in particular, planning and control (Mikhalkova and Others v. Ukraine, para. 36; McCann and Others v. the UK [GC], para. 150). The legislative and administrative framework must clearly define the limited circumstances in which law enforcement officers may use firearms, and police officers must not be left in a state of uncertainty regarding these limits (Soare and Others v. Romania, para. 129).

The true measure of police effectiveness is the ability to resolve critical situations without resorting to lethal force. It is in this direction that modern policing is developing in democratic countries, where officers acquire skills honed over years in de-escalation, psychological influence and – only in extreme cases – the use of weapons. The ECtHR in Soare and Others v. Romania explicitly stated that the absence of clear rules and proper training explains the inadequate and autonomous actions of police officers in critical situations (para. 135). And in Celniku v. Greece, the Court held that Article 2 of the ECHR covers not only the direct actions of police officers but also staff training: if the level of training does not correspond to the complexity of the tasks at hand, the state bears responsibility.

NEUTRALISATION OF THE ATTACKER: ARTICLE 2 OF THE ECHR AND THE RIGHT TO LIFE

Minister of Internal Affairs Ihor Klymenko stated that KORD special forces carried out a raid and neutralised the attacker. During the assault, the perpetrator resisted law enforcement officers and opened fire on them.

In the acute phase of a crisis, when a person is actively shooting at police officers, the use of lethal force is formally justified even under the strict standards of Article 2 of the Convention.

The ECtHR, in cases such as McCann and Others v. United Kingdom, Nachova v. Bulgaria and Finogenov v. Russia, has consistently developed the criterion of ‘absolute necessity’: the state is obliged to prove that the person’s death was the result of force that did not exceed what was absolutely necessary in the specific circumstances. At the same time, as explained in McCann and Others v. the UK [GC] (para. 200), the use of force is justified only where the agents genuinely believed that opening fire was necessary and had subjectively sufficient grounds for doing so — rather than merely following orders.

The standard of ‘absolute necessity’ is stricter than the criterion of ‘necessary in a democratic society’ under Articles 8 and 11 of the ECHR: force must be strictly proportionate (Jaloud v. the Netherlands [GC], para. 199; Kelly and Others v. the UK, para. 93). In a situation involving the rescue of a hostage from an armed criminal offering active resistance, these conditions may be met — but this still requires verification.

But this is precisely where the issue begins that most commentators prefer to sidestep. The state is obliged to conduct an effective independent investigation into whether there really was no other tactical option. Were all possibilities for a non-violent resolution of the situation exhausted? Was the timing of the assault correctly chosen? Is every shot fired by KORD officers documented and justified? The ECtHR in Al-Skeini and Others v. the UK [GC] (para. 163) and Armani Da Silva v. the UK [GC] (para. 233) clearly stated: the investigation must cover not only the immediate actions of those carrying out the operation but also the planning and control of the operation as a whole; it must be capable of establishing whether the use of force was justified. Any shortcoming that undermines this capability constitutes a violation of the procedural aspect of Article 2 of the ECHR. A telling example is the case of Finogenov and Others v. Russia (Operation ‘Nord-Ost’), where the Court found a violation precisely because of the incompleteness and bias of the investigation.

In the context of Ukraine during a full-scale invasion, a public demand for an investigation into the circumstances of the death of a man who had just killed six civilians sounds critically unpopular. But this is precisely the essence of the rule of law: Article 2 of the ECHR protects the right to life not only of the criminal’s victims, but also of the criminal himself. Without this principle, the entire human rights framework becomes a situational compromise of the majority, rather than a system of universal guarantees. Article 2 of the ECHR imposes a positive obligation on the state not only to refrain from the intentional deprivation of life, but also to take preventive measures to protect persons within its jurisdiction (Yuriy Illarionovich Shchokin v. Ukraine, para. 35). A general legal prohibition on arbitrary deprivation of life becomes ineffective without an effective review procedure: this is precisely how the Court formulated it in Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC] (para. 249) and Al-Skeini and Others v. the UK [GC] (para. 163). Andronicou and Constantinou v. Cyprus demonstrates that even a hostage rescue operation resulting in the death of a perpetrator may be deemed lawful – but only provided that planning was carried out with a view to minimising risk, negotiations were conducted rationally, and the operatives had clear instructions to use only proportionate force (para. 194).

Furthermore, there is a purely practical argument: a lieutenant-colonel in the Russian Armed Forces who had lived in Ukraine, made donations to the ‘SVO’ and ultimately carried out a mass shooting – this was a source of information of exceptional value to counter-intelligence. His motives, connections, possible handlers and funding channels could all have been established during interrogations. His elimination has permanently shut down that channel.

THE DANGER OF ‘SECURITY’ DISCOURSE AND HUMAN RIGHTS

This tragedy will inevitably give rise to legislative initiatives. Some will be aimed at tightening controls on the circulation of weapons — and this is justified and necessary. But others — and this is where alarm bells should ring — will use this incident to justify expanding the police apparatus, intensifying preventive surveillance and legalising ‘proactive’ operational measures.

This mechanism is well known in human rights practice: a terrorist attack or large-scale crime becomes a ‘window of opportunity’ for the state to expand its powers in areas where citizens would not normally permit such intrusion. Laws passed ‘in the heat of the moment’ are, as a rule, not repealed even after the shock has passed.

The right to private and family life, guaranteed by Article 8 of the ECHR, the right to the protection of personal data, the right not to be subject to preventive police surveillance without sufficient grounds – all these guarantees are under threat whenever society experiences a sudden surge of fear. The standard of ‘necessary in a democratic society’ under Article 8 of the ECHR is less stringent than the criterion of ‘absolutely necessary’ under Article 2, but even this does not permit the state to introduce widespread preventive surveillance without individual grounds and judicial oversight. The task of the human rights community, the legal profession and the academic community is to ensure that a single tragedy does not become a justification for systemic restrictions on rights that will affect millions of people who have no connection whatsoever to the crime.

POLICE TRAINING

A dangerous trend that has long been brewing within the Ukrainian police has now gained new momentum: a readiness to use weapons before establishing the facts. The tragedy of 18 April risks becoming not a warning but a justification for this logic – and it is currently extremely difficult to assess the true scale of such a shift.

That is precisely why this case must serve as a compelling argument in favour of a systematic review of police training – but not in the direction of improving marksmanship or physical skills. We are talking about something fundamentally different: training officers in the art of communication, the ability to defuse tension in real time and the professional application of de-escalation techniques.

The true measure of the effectiveness of a modern police force is the ability to resolve critical situations without violence. The shift from a punitive model to one of dialogue and professional restraint is not romanticism but a practical necessity. This is where the future of Ukraine’s law enforcement system lies.

CONCLUSIONS

This tragedy presents a multi-layered challenge. For society, it is a call for restraint amidst emotional pressure and the temptation of simplistic answers. For legislators, it is a challenge to draft regulations that genuinely enhance safety without becoming instruments of punitive bureaucracy. For the police, it is a mirror in which they must see not their own heroism but their systemic shortcomings in training, de-escalation and tactical flexibility. For human rights defenders, it is a reminder that the protection of human rights cannot be conditional: either it applies to everyone, or it does not exist as a principle.

Six families are mourning their loved ones. This is an undeniable reality, and it takes precedence. But the appropriate response to these deaths is not a new wave of police aggression or a flurry of emotional legislation – it is a systematic, dispassionate and honest analysis of where the system failed, and how to fix it without losing our humanity.

Through practical exercises and interactive discussions, participants enhanced their understanding of how to systematically gather, assess, and use information from human sources to inform operational decisions. The workshop also encouraged the exchange of experiences and best practices among law enforcement professionals from across the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Đorđe Đogović, the ILP Project Manager at the Mission, emphasized the importance of the workshop, stating: “Effective intelligence gathering from human sources and analysis are at the heart of proactive policing. Strengthening the skills and knowledge of police officers in this field contributes to a more efficient, informed, and co-ordinated response to serious security threats.”

This workshop is part of the OSCE Mission to BiH project Enhancing Intelligence-led Policing to Combat Serious Security Threats and Crimes (ILP Project), implemented with the generous support of Austria, Germany, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Norway, Poland, and Türkiye. By strengthening capacities of law enforcement, the initiative contributes to safer communities, more resilient institutions, and enhanced overall security across Bosnia and Herzegovina.

On October 28, 2025, a large-scale police operation took place in the Complexo do Alemão and Complexo da Penha communities, reportedly aimed at enforcing some 100 judicial warrants against individuals linked to organized criminal groups. According to official information, at least 121 people were killed, including four police officers. Some 81 people were detained.

For decades, the high lethality associated with policing in Brazil has become normalized, particularly in areas like Rio de Janeiro, where it has recently increased significantly. Brazil must break the cycle of extreme brutality and ensure that law enforcement operations comply with international standards regarding the use of force.

Türk called for prompt, independent, and effective investigations into Tuesday’s events and for a comprehensive policing reform.

Independent mechanisms should also be established to support the families and communities affected to help them access justice and reparation.

Türk urged the authorities to adopt a national policing strategy rooted in a human rights-based approach. Any use of potentially lethal force must be aligned with the principles of legality, necessity, proportionality, and non-discrimination. Lethal force may only be used when strictly necessary to protect life or prevent serious injury from an imminent threat.

Addressing systemic racism against people of African descent in Brazil is paramount.

According to the International Independent Expert Mechanism to Advance Racial Justice and Equality in Law Enforcement (EMLER), the killing of people of African descent by law enforcement in Brazil is not only generalized but is also carried out in a systematic way. An estimated 5,000 people of African descent are killed by the police each year. Young men of African descent living in impoverished areas are the main victims.

“It is time to end a system that perpetuates racism, discrimination, and injustice,” said the UN Human Rights Chief.

“Reforms are urgently needed to avoid repetition. Violations cannot go unpunished. Proper accountability processes must lead to truth and justice to avoid further impunity and violence.”

Officers learn to quickly assess situations, identify threats, and choose appropriate responses under pressure.

2. Focus of enhanced communication skills

Scenario training allows officers to practice verbal de-escalation, active listening, and clear communication with suspects and the public.

3. Refined tactical skills

Officers can practice using force appropriately, employing defensive tactics, and executing searches and arrests in a safe setting.

4. De-escalation

A goal is to train officers to de-escalate volatile situations, minimizing the need to use force.

5. Stress management

Scenarios can help officers become more comfortable with stress and learn to manage their reactions.

6. Cultural sensitivity and bias awareness

Scenarios can be designed to address implicit biases and promote understanding of diverse communities.

7. Reduced use of force

By improving communication and de-escalation skills, scenario training can contribute to a decrease in the use of force.

8. Increased confidence

Regular practice builds confidence and prepares officers to handle complex situations.

9. Improved public safety

Well-trained officers are better equipped to protect themselves and the public.

California is among the first states to address the issue. The reporting was cited in the legislative analysis of the bill that ultimately became the law.

Senate Bill 524, signed into law Oct. 10, requires police officers to disclose when they use AI to write police reports. The tools include Draft One, an AI assistant that transcribes and summarizes body-camera footage to produce a draft report, which officers can then revise and edit.

Specifically, the law now requires a written disclosure to appear at the bottom of each page of a police report for which Draft One or other similar tools were used. The legislation also requires an “audit trail” that would preserve the original draft as well as identify the source bodycam footage or audio.

Police departments in East Palo Alto and Fresno were among the first in the state to adopt the technology.

For example, officers must fill in prompts within the generated report, then sign off on the report’s accuracy before it can be submitted. The tool also includes a disclaimer that Draft One was used, though police agencies have thus far been able to customize where in a report it’s placed.

Police departments have said the technology saves officers significant time, and even that some AI-generated reports are better than the ones written entirely by officers. Nevertheless, the bill arose out of concerns that bias or errors generated by AI software could make their way into final incident reports, which play a key role in charging, detaining and sentencing suspects.

Kate Chatfield, executive director of the California Public Defenders Association, which sponsored the bill, said she’s grateful the measure became law.

“Due process requires transparency,” Chatfield wrote in a public statement. “Everyone in the legal system — judges, juries, attorneys and the accused — deserve to know who wrote the police report.”

“With SB 524, California is sending a clear message: Innovation in policing must be tethered to accountability,” state Sen. Jesse Arreguín, who wrote the bill, said in the statement. “No more opaque reports, no more guessing whether AI shaped the narrative.”

Kevin Little, a defense attorney in Fresno, said the law is a step in the right direction, but not a true remedy.

“My own experience with AI in an unrelated context leads me to conclude that AI platforms have a significant amount of user bias and tend to support the agendas of the user,” he said.

Larry Bowlan, a spokesperson for the Fresno Police Department, said the agency had already implemented some of the safeguards now required by the law and does not expect the new rules to be especially burdensome.

“Our AI-powered narrative assistant … already generates a disclosure and requires our users to sign acknowledgements. Draft One also already produces the requisite audit trail,” he wrote in an email. “We are actively working with our vendor on the best solution for preserving and storing the first draft provided by the assistant, as well as a minor tweak to ensure the disclosure is present on each printed page, rather than just the first page as it is now.”

A spokesperson for the East Palo Alto Department said his agency has no official response to the law at this time.

Opponents of the bill included the California Police Chiefs Association and the Police Officers Research Association of California, a police union advocacy and lobbying group. The Chiefs Association did not respond to a request for comment. In a statement, PORAC President Brian R. Marvel said the signed version of the law is an improvement over earlier drafts.

“In its original form, SB 524 would have put significant administrative burden on already short-staffed police forces and created broad liability by requiring agencies to retain every AI-generated draft, interim, and final version of a report, each labeled with AI disclosure language,” he wrote. “PORAC advocated to amend this bill … We were pleased to see several of these amendments taken, with the final version of the bill significantly narrowed.”

Axon representative Victoria Keough said the company is committed to complying with all state and federal laws, including SB 524.

“When developing AI for public safety, transparency and accountability are essential,” Keough wrote in a statement. “Responsible innovation remains at the core of how Axon designs and delivers new technology.”

The new requirements go into effect on Jan. 1, 2026.

By Kerry Klein, KVPR

Kerry Klein is a reporter and editor with KVPR in Fresno. Additional reporting was provided by KQED’s Sukey Lewis. The story was produced with support from The California Newsroom, a collaboration of public media outlets throughout the state. 

Tech Highlights of the Hybrid Training Model

• AI-Powered Simulations: Recruits will engage with artificial intelligence-driven scenarios that mimic real-world policing challenges—ranging from crowd control to cyber fraud detection. These simulations aim to sharpen decision-making and situational awareness.
• Cybercrime and Digital Forensics: The curriculum includes hands-on training in cybercrime investigation, digital evidence handling, and online threat mitigation. Officers will learn to trace IP addresses, decrypt digital trails, and respond to phishing and ransomware cases.
• Smart Classrooms and E-Learning: Training centers are being equipped with smart boards, biometric attendance systems, and cloud-based learning platforms. Recruits can access legal modules, case studies, and forensic tutorials remotely.
• Drone and Surveillance Tech: Select units will receive exposure to drone operations, facial recognition systems, and real-time surveillance tools—preparing them for tech-assisted field operations.
• Data Ethics and Privacy: Officers will be sensitized to digital rights, data protection laws, and ethical boundaries in tech-enabled policing.

Strategic Vision

The hybrid model reflects CM Yogi Adityanath’s broader vision to align UP Police with global standards in digital law enforcement. By embedding technology into foundational training, the state aims to build a force that is not only physically agile but digitally literate and ethically grounded.

Source and text

The aim of the report is to provide an evidence-based understanding of how the proliferation of AI systems is reshaping the landscape of serious online criminality.

This research aims to equip policymakers and security practitioners to plan for emerging criminal use cases and better position themselves to respond to novel threats now and over the next five years.

This time horizon is an operational priority for the UK security and law enforcement community, while also being the current government’s window for action until the next general election.

Many police officers, therefore, ignore training and conversations on ethnic profiling, which hinders combating it. We describe the foundations of a Virtual Reality based training prototype that seeks to encourage active participation in ethnic profiling dialogue.

We describe the iterative process between the various steps in the design process of the Virtual Reality tool and the design features including experiential learning and perspective-taking on the individual level, and constructive controversy dialogue on the group level.

Our observations during its testing phase indicate that the current prototype contributes to officers’ awareness of ineffective and biased police practices.

While this testifies to the potential of the prototype design to shape meaningful police reform activities on a larger scale, we also speculate that our immersive design may offer solutions for other urgent socio-political controversies.

1 Introduction

Police organizations around the world are increasingly criticized for the way they treat ethnic minorities (de Maillard et al., 2024; Meeteren et al., 2023). One of these practices is popularly known as ethnic profiling. The Council of Europe has defined ethnic profiling as ‘the use by the police, with no objective and reasonable justification, of grounds such as race, color, language, religion, nationality or national or ethnic origin in control, surveillance or investigation activities’ (Council of Europe, 2019). As such, ethnic profiling represents an unlawful practice and is argued to cause various negative effects. This ranges from a general decline in police legitimacy and public trust, to more operational consequences evidenced by a reluctance of communities to cooperate with police officers and a decreased ability of the police to gather intelligence (Jackson et al., 2012; Tyler, 2004; Tyler and Blader, 2003; Tyler and Wakslak, 2004).

Following (alleged) ethnic profiling incidents, and informed by studies into racial disproportionality in crime statistics (e.g., Pierson et al., 2020 for the United States; FRA, 2017; FRA, 2019 for Europe), politicians and police chiefs around the world have advocated change. For example, the European Parliament has called for actions to end all forms of racism and aggression (Narrillos, 2020), while Dwight Henninger, the president of the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP), announced a multiple-year Public Trust Campaign (Police Chief, 2022). Many police departments around the globe are now adopting various measures to reduce ethnic profiling, such as oversight, monitoring solutions, and, specifically, different kinds of awareness and soft-skill training (Lai and Lisnek, 2023; R. E; Worden et al., 2024).

Traditional approaches to training the police on ethic profiling have proved challenging (Vitriol et al., 2024), mostly due to a lack of officer support and an unwillingness to participate in reform. As illustrated by Skogan (2008 p. 23); “Police officers do not want to be plagued with out-of-touch programs that adds to their workload and gives them tasks that lie outside their comfort zone.” This is supported by a recent survey study examining police officers’ attitudes towards participation in ethnic profiling training (Böing et al., 2025). It showed that one-third of the participating police officers (total n = 263) reported no interest in training as they did not consider themselves biased. Others did not want to participate because they perceived it as an exaggerated topic, were explicitly against training, believing it was wrong, or were not necessarily against reform but reluctant to engage in such a training out of fear of being evaluated negatively by their peers.

The various forms of resistance arguably have negative consequences for the successful implementation and deployment of reform measures. Yet, resistance is often overlooked and underestimated by leaders and practitioners. In the context of heated public debates about racial bias and inequality, police leaders may be tempted to opt for interventions that are quickly realizable and sometimes merely for “damage control” (Engel et al., 2020; p.160). Many police departments are currently experiencing intensified scrutiny which should motivate police leaders to adopt evidence-based strategies that effectively improve police work (Engel et al., 2020).

Given the need for effective interventions to prevent ethnic profiling, we have developed a prototype of a training with interactive 360° film in Virtual Reality (VR) to stimulate ethnic profiling dialogues among police officers, while raising awareness of their own potential biases in day-to-day police activities. In recent years, VR has emerged as a promising tool for enhancing training responses in high-stress professions, notably among police officers (Muñoz et al., 2024), due to its unique capacity to offer engaging experiences (Hube et al., 2024).

The paper describes the various steps taken in the development of the training, and the theoretical and practical considerations that lay at its foundations. In the Results section, we discuss our observations of a pilot study involving a small number of police officers, examining the suitability of our prototype as a tool that effectively helps police officers to address ethnic profiling on the work floor and improve police work.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Methodological considerations

To develop the current prototype, Sedlmair et al. (2012) framework was used as guidance. This framework addresses specific real-world problems faced by domain experts, that require a visualization solution, and has been used by many academics ever since (see, e.g., Lotteraner et al., 2023; Ruan et al., 2023; Van Den Brandt et al., 2024). Considering that many officers are unaware or indifferent about racial bias, a VR learning experience could raise their awareness of racial bias in everyday policing, and encourage their involvement in reforms.

In the first phase of the framework–the Precondition phase–relevant literature and policy documents were collected, examined previous initiatives and built a network of experts and practitioners to help with the design. In the subsequent Core phase, the emphasis moved to the actual translation of the problem into a solution. In this phase, a case was made for using experiential, social and affective learning strategies, resulting in a prototype consisting an interactive 360° film in VR, followed by reflective group dialogues. Finally, in the Analysis phase it was explored how the developed prototype worked in practice, by introducing it to a small number of police officers visiting a symposium for police innovation.

Figure 1 shows an overview of this framework with these three phases: a precondition phase, a core phase, and an analysis phase, each involving two or more stages. While outlined as a linear process, the overlapping stages and gray arrows imply the iterative nature of this process.

On the basis of the preparatory work done in the precondition phase, I focus on the Core phase and conclude with the Analysis phase. The steps of the Core phase are described in the next paragraphs, while these steps of the Analysis phase are described in the Results (3) section.

The first crucial step in this design study was to understand how police officers, in general (prefer to) learn. While studying the available literature, I realized the importance of considering not only what ‘new’ knowledge should be offered, but also how it should be offered, and by whom.

2.2 Theoretical framework

Implicit (racial) biases are a major issue in society. This issue is not only common and widely prevalent in society (e.g., Pierson et al., 2020 for the United States; FRA, 2017; FRA, 2019 for Europe), but also hard to change (de Maillard et al., 2024; Meeteren et al., 2023). While various training initiatives have been introduced to reduce implicit bias, experts have been skeptical about their effectiveness (Engel et al., 2020; R; Worden et al., 2020; R. E; Worden et al., 2024). Frequently, these initiatives involve a single workshops or presentation in a class room setting, leading to temporarily effects at best (Lai and Lisnek, 2023). A training to reduce implicit bias in the New York Police Department (R. Worden et al., 2020) found several positive results. Officers showed improved awareness of implicit bias and positive attitudes towards diverse community members after training. A follow-up training, however, found no significant changes in behavior (R. E. Worden et al., 2024).

2.2.1 Experiential learning

Interactive elements, such as role-play and group discussions, are believed to have contributed the training’s success. Consistent with experiential learning literature (cf. Dewey, 1938; Green et al., 2024; Kolb and Kolb, 2005), adding interactive elements can stimulate motivation and engagement. Besides, studies show that when participants are invited to directly perform the task or skill at hand, it helps them to better understand and remember key information offered in the training (Fromm et al., 2021; Martirosov and Kopecek, 2017; Sharar et al., 2016).

While traditional experiential learning has advantages, it also has a number of downsides. Activities can be resource intensive (e.g., it requires time, money, and materials for effective use), and training sessions cannot be done independently regarding time and location (Fridell and Böing, 2023). Moreover, some people may feel anxious or overwhelmed in hands-on exercises, such as role-play (Downing et al., 2020).

2.2.2 Virtual reality

Scholars have suggested using immersive technologies, such as Virtual Reality (VR), for training, education, and experiential learning, for a number of reasons. VR can simulate real-world scenarios with high fidelity, allowing users to experience situations that may be difficult to recreate in role-play (Louis, 2024). People can learn, for instance, how to extinguish a fire and bandage wounded victims, without putting their, or others people’s, life at stake (Xie et al., 2021). Today, VR is increasingly used for implicit bias training as well. In studies by Groom et al. (2009) and Peck et al. (2013) participants engaged in virtual environments where they embodied characters from marginalized groups, to let them experience what it is like to be discriminated against. Both studies demonstrate the effectiveness of virtual reality as a tool for fostering social empathy and understanding.

While these studies indicate that such an experience can promote awareness and reduce bias, by allowing individuals to walk in someone else’s shoes, it is unclear whether these outcomes can also be expected in relation to police officers on the issue of ethnic profiling. Among law enforcers, this practice is generally downplayed (Shiner, 2010); cases are seen as ‘isolated incidents’, caused by a few ‘rotten apples’ (Griffin, 2020). Studies indicate that police officers see themselves as the ‘real victims’ due to the many accusations at their address (Nix and Wolfe, 2017). It is therefore the question if police officers could, and would want to recognize themselves in a narrative about ethnic profiling, in which they feature as perpetrators. The notion of a ‘racist cop’ challenges their assumed innocence and respected self-image (R. Worden et al., 2020). In this context, efforts to create awareness and reduce implicit bias by showing an example of ethnic profiling from a victim’s perspective, may not work among police officers.

Alternatively, to mitigate resisting responses, the VR content could be offered to them from a police perspective. A number of conditions are important to consider to promote awareness and reduce bias. First, it is important that the scenarios feel real to participating officers, and are offered in a non-accusatory way. Terms such as (institutional) racism, discrimination, and even ethnic profiling, should receive as little emphasis as possible. Instead, labels such as ‘professional police stops’ and ‘engaging in effective police work’ should be used. Moreover, consistent with research done by Roboh and Tedjaatmadja (2016), users should be appreciated for their input, and offered reassurance by communicating that engaging in the VR simulation is no assessment, and that making errors is not only permissible but also an integral phase of the educational journey. Taking these points seriously would contribute to a psychologically safe learning environment, and encourage everyone’s active participation (e.g., Edmondson, 1999). Second, interactive VR experiences should be considered as these offer several advantages over passive ones. For starters, as interactive VR requires active participation, it can lead to higher levels of engagement and motivation compared to simply observing a passive experience (Fox et al., 2009; Martirosov and Kopecek, 2017; Witmer and Singer, 1998). Subsequently, as users can influence the direction of the experience, and see the immediate results of their choices, this allows for a more tailored learning journey that can adapt to individual preferences and needs (Barbot and Kaufman, 2020). Under time pressure, this could reveal (racial) biases in the decision-making process (Kahneman, 2011).

2.2.3 Social learning

Echoing Dewey’s advocacy for learning through doing and reflecting, contemporary scholars argue that experiential learning is best served when experiences are being discussed, analyzed and reflected upon. This may help to have them re-evaluating their initial point of view, which causes them to engage in higher-level cognitive reasoning (Green et al., 2024; Kolb and Kolb, 2005). Related to the topic of this study, discussing, analyzing, and reflecting on experiences from the interactive VR scenario training, can possibly stimulate awareness of their own potential biases in day-to-day police activities and how these can be mitigated. This reflective process may also foster empathy, which research shows is a key mechanism in reducing prejudice during intergroup contact (Pettigrew and Tropp, 2008). By encouraging participants to engage with alternative perspectives in a supportive setting, group dialogues can deepen understanding and promote meaningful attitude change.

Based on social identity theory (Tafjel and Turner, 1985) individuals derive part of their identity from group memberships, which provides a sense of belonging and self-worth. For this reason, sensitive dialogues are best conducted in peer groups, guided by moderators from within the police. These ingroup facilitators are often seen as more trustworthy. Toch (2008) and Worden et al. (2020) found that interventions gain credibility when co-created with fellow officers. This approach can reduce resistance and lead to more meaningful change.

Although police officers are often seen as one group, discussions about racial profiling can divide them. Research indeed shows the existence of pro- and anti-reform camps within police departments (Böing et al., 2025). These internal divisions can resemble intergroup conflict. In such cases, dialogue may serve as a form of intergroup contact and help reducing prejudice in these situations (cf. Pettigrew and Tropp, 2008). Facilitated discussions, especially when combined with VR experiences, may help bridge divides and promote mutual understanding.

To summarize, experiential learning can provide a suitable approach to motivate police officers to participate in reform activities, and enhance learning. VR experiences, and particularly interactive VR, tends to provide a richer, more dynamic learning experience (than passive VR) – especially when combined with group dialogues.

2.3 Building the prototype

Based on the considerations described above, a training was developed, consisting interactive 360° film in VR (hereafter: 360° film VR) followed by a group dialogue to reflect, analyze and discuss the different choices made in VR. The two parts of this training are here discussed in detail.

2.3.1 Using 360° film VR

For the first part of the training, 360° film was used to create a highly realistic VR experience. This can deliver stunning visuals and cinematic experiences, showcasing real locations, events, or stories in a way that captivates viewers. As explained in detail below, this first scenario featured the main entrance of train Station Sloterdijk in Amsterdam, which is known to most Dutch police officers. In this scenario participants are put in the position of a police officer, from a ‘first person view’, who is on patrol. This task is fairly known to the participants as well. Arguably, this realism enhances ‘presence’, which relates to the subjective sensation of ‘being there’ and facilitates users to devote attention to the situation they are experiencing. This makes experiences feel more intensive, and individuals more motivated to participate experience (Fox et al., 2009; Martirosov and Kopecek, 2017; Witmer and Singer, 1998).

While 360° film can help crafting compelling stories, which can leverage the immersive nature of VR, one of the main downsides is the reduced sense of agency. Whereas regular VR allows users to make choices and take actions that directly impact their experience, fostering a sense of agency, in 360° films is more difficult due to digital limitations (Barbot and Kaufman, 2020; Wiebe et al., 2014). Most 360° film VR projects are primarily passive; viewers can only look around but cannot affect the narrative or environment (Tassinari et al., 2022). Inspired by Buttussi and Chittaro (2018) who used branching scenarios in VR for in-flight safety trainings, this project used the same technique to give participants a sense of agency.

The scenarios used for this prototype required participating police officers to first choose a person of interest among dozens of people that could be seen walking in and out of the train station building. Regardless of the person selected, participants can determine how they treat this person, by choosing between several escalating or de-escalating behavioral options. Subsequent responses are contingent upon these choices. For example, if a participant would decide to ID-check one of the characters in the scenario, an ID-check would follow, providing the participant with new clues about the character’s ‘guilt’. However, the participant may also believe in the character’s ‘innocence’, or decide that there is insufficient legal ground to use particular police powers, and choose to let him go.

This sense of being in charge of their own decisions during gameplay (‘sense of agency’), made it possible to later reflect, analyze, and discuss, the choices made by the participants. Therefore, much effort was put in having the dilemmas and optioned solutions (the branches) to correspond with real life. When decisions would not reflect the daily actions of officers, group discussions may fail to encourage self-reflection and critical thinking, as participants will not feel responsible for their decisions in the simulation. To prevent this from happening, all variations were checked with first line police officers for their accuracy and realism, and aligned with current legal and ethical principles for conducting proactive police investigations, including the organization’s Code of Practice.

2.3.2 The VR branches (story) in detail

At the start of the scenario, participants are put in the position of a police officer in front of the train station Sloterdijk. Another (virtual) police officer in the simulation, who has joined the patrol, asks if the participant “sees someone who is worth inquiring”. The participants then have 2 minutes to observe the various people at the square, and to take action at their own discretion. Ideally, they are not distracted by their implicit bias in relation to people and places, and look for behavior that would objectively legitimize police intervention, notably behavior that fits a particular modus operandi.

Although dozens of people are seen in the simulation, not everyone could be selected for a conversation. When participants nevertheless tried to select this person, a text balloon appeared containing the text “I am not participating”, after which they could continue their surveillance. Hidden between these people, two situations were designed to attract attention: (1) a man who is approaching passers-by for short conversations, and in a 90° angle further to the left; (2) four young men who are standing near the entrance of the train station.

Despite the fact that these men did not do anything wrong, they possess certain characteristics that may attract the attention of Dutch police officers (i.e., all young, and male, who seem to ‘belong’ to an ethnic minority that is associated with crime and nuisance; Kleijer-Kool and Landman, 2016). As a consequence, some participating officers may feel an urge to inquire about who they are, and what they are doing there. However, such police behavior can well be interpreted as discriminatory and unlawful. If participants instead focus their attention on the man addressing passers-by, they may observe him speaking to three different people, who do not like his attention, shaking their heads, and gesturing dismissively. In the end, they may find out that this man is peddling drugs.

In both story lines, participants are asked at different times, and under time pressure, to choose how to proceed in the interaction based on the information available. “Desirable” choices according to the Code of Practice, are those that have a sufficiently legal basis. “Undesirable” choices are those without sufficient legal basis. Some examples of desirable and undesirable choices are presented in Figures 4, 5.

Figure 4 presents an example of an ideal route. Ideally, the participants select the man who addresses passers-by, and after hearing the man’s explanation about his whereabouts (e.g., he vaguely explains that he was just asking for directions), they look for a witness to check the validity of his explanation. The witness in the simulation testifies that the man was trying to sell her drugs, which according to Section 9 of the Dutch Narcotics Act provides a legal pretext to search the man’s pockets, or to directly place him under arrest. Alternatively, participants perform an ID-check directly before hearing the witness, depending on their justification. When participants can reasonably make a case that the man has malicious intent, based on behavior and explanation (which can be argued in this scenario), they may conduct an ID-check based on Section 8 of the Dutch Police Act [Politiewet].

Figure 5 gives an example of a non-ideal route. Non-ideal is when participants select the young men for a conversation. Whereas it is not illegal to have a friendly chat, the crucial question is why they should be selected over other characters in the simulation. Especially concerning is when is participants opt for performing an ID check, and even decide to arrest the young men for offending a police officer. Non-ideal routes also exist in the other trajectory, for example, when participants decide to search the man’s pockets without sufficient legal basis. Acting on the basis of a vague explanation about the man’s whereabouts alone, is not sufficient.

Figure 6 shows an example, in relation to the group of young men, of how participants face a dilemma with two choices; ‘Start conversation’ or ‘Ask for ID-card’, displayed in separate squares with a 5-s timer. The film continues playing in the background as the clock runs. Figure 7 shows an example, in relation to the man who addresses passers-by and appears to possess a small amount of cocaine. In this scenario, participants can choose between ‘arrest’ or ‘let go’.

Upon completion, participants receive automated feedback on each of the 10 story branches (‘Alpha’ to ‘Juliet’), based on the decisions made in the simulation. In the event participants did not select anyone, or failed to make a decision in time, no code was distributed. Integrated feedback can help achieving norm-compliant behavior; it can give tips for improvement, and remind participants of the desired behavior (Louis, 2024).

When participants have acted in accordance with the law and the Code of Practice, they receive compliments and are encouraged to discuss their observations and considerations, that inspired them to make these choices, with other participants. However, when participants did not act well, they are informed that other choices could have been better and are encouraged to discuss their choices with other participants.

Compare the following two examples. When participants acted desirably and ended in story branch ‘Bravo’, as described in the example above, they received the following feedback in VR: “You handled this situation very well. You selected the right man who later appeared to sell drugs. The investigation in the area gave you the legal justification to search his clothes. To prevent ethnic profiling, never base your decisions on stereotypes, but always on deviant and criminal behaviour instead. You did this very well”. In contrast, when participants acted undesirably and ended in story branch ‘Golf’, they received the following feedback: “You chose to stop and investigate the young men, who reacted rather annoyed on your decision. I’m curious what you thought of their reaction. Please explain why you found these men noticeable and chose to intervene. You may want to repeat this simulation later.”

2.3.3 Group dialogue

After having experienced the scenario in 360° film VR, the participants are invited to a group dialogue to reflect on their experience. In this second part of the training, participants are encouraged to reflect critically on their policing choices. The purpose of these talks is that they will discover whether their choices were appropriate. To do this, a structured approach was followed with the four stages of constructive controversy methodology (Johnson, 2015) – (1) presenting and advocating the first position, (2) challenging and questioning the opposing position, (3) reversing perspectives and restating the opposing position, and (4) synthesizing and integrating the positions.

As a first step, the moderator invites participants who acted undesirably–in this case initiated a conversation with the group of young men–to share their observations with the group and explain the reasons for their selection. When these participants reach the point where nothing new is shared, the moderator invites the other participants to challenge these positions, by sharing what they have seen and done in the simulation. This is the point where participants from the first group should realize that there may have been better choices, for example, initiating a conversation with the person selling drugs to people. Subsequently, the various decisions are being discussed that have led to a particular outcome.

While these discussions may create anxiety and uncertainty, it may also stimulate curiosity among participants, encouraging them to think critically about their initial views. Some may even want to try the simulation again. This experiential learning could lead to greater interest in the rules for proactive police stops, and understanding the psychology of implicit bias, which in combination can help to prevent ethnic profiling.

2.3.4 Affective communication

The moderators’ skills to build a positive atmosphere in the class are paramount. When participants sense that they are wrong or feel they are being ridiculed for having made undesirable choices in the simulation, it may invoke defensive reactions. A positive atmosphere can be achieved by applying neutral and non-judgmental language, and reassuring, rewarding, and appreciating participants. This allows the participants to speak up and take interpersonal risks without being punished or ridiculed for it (Edmondson, 1999).

3 Results

To explore the functioning of the prototype training, specifically if it could stimulate police officers to engage in constructive dialogues about ethnic profiling, it was introduced to a small number of law enforcers visiting a symposium for police innovation, in Ede, Netherlands, in January 2021. A total of 65 participants, equally distributed over four rounds of workshops, signed up for a ‘workshop with VR’. The majority of them (about threequarters) were male, between 30 and 40 years of age, and overall native Dutch, which roughly correspond with demographic distributions within the Dutch National Police. At entry, the participants did not know that this workshop was centered around the theme of ethnic profiling. They were only informed sparsely about the study’s aims, and that their responses were being observe during the pilot, and their experiences inquired in a questionnaire at the end. People were allowed to participate or leave the room if they did not want to be part of the study. None of the participants left. However, not all participated; eight police officers only wanted to observe. These were left out of the study. The remaining participants were requested to form small groups up to three people, who were then distributed ‘Oculus Go’ VR goggles with fitting audio headsets. After participating in both the simulation and the subsequent dialogue, participants were given full disclosure about the study’s aims, and asked consent to use their response anonymously. Only the material was used of the 44 participants who signed an informed consent document. Reasons for not signing varied, ranging from not feeling comfortable with participating in research or the research topic, to (mostly) having to leave early because of other commitments [e.g., going to the next round of workshops].

The observations first tried to capture their experience while doing the 360° film VR. When they, for instance, would exhibit physical motions whilst in the VR environment, then this would indicate that they are immersed and perceive the content as realistic. Also, the subsequent group dialogue was observed, particularly if participants felt psychologically safe to share their own perspectives, and were tolerant towards different views at the same time. If participants would lively share perspectives, while listening to the perspectives of others, then this would indicate that participants dare to take risks without fear for other team members’ opinions. If in doubt, this was checked with the participants personally afterwards.

It appeared that the participants enjoyed the 360° film VR. Some were seen conversing with the people in the simulation, and using their arms and hands, indicating considerable levels of immersion and realism (see Figure 8). Others were heard stating that the content felt very real, or were speaking lengthy, and with enthusiasm, about their experiences, as soon as they took off the VR equipment. With respect to engagement, there was ample variety in the choices made by the participants in the simulation. For instance, the number of participants who focused on the sole man addressing passers-by was slightly higher (n = 24) than the number of participants initiating conversations with the group of young men at the station entrance (n = 14). Finally, there were also some participants (n = 6) who did not make any selection at all.

Also, with respect to the subsequent escalating and de-escalating choices, participants made very different choices. These differences added significantly to the quality of the subsequent dialogues. Figure 9 shows an example of a group dialogue after VR.

In most groups, participants were observed having lively debates with other participants on differences in the choices they had made. Sharing these observations led to curiosity, which in some cases made participants wanting to do the scenario again to explore alternative options.

13 of the 27 participants, who could have opted for more legal and ethical decisions, indicated that the dialogues made them realize that they could have made these better choices in the simulation. One participant, for example, shared that she associated the physical appearance of the group of young men with crime and nuisance, which had motivated her to start a ‘friendly conversation’ to see if she could somehow find clues that would confirm her initial gut feeling. She also indicated that the group dialogue disclosing the alternative view, that these may just be ordinary young men with no malicious intent at all, had changed her perspective.

In contrast, 13 other participants stated that they would not do anything different in a next instance. For example, two participants who conducted a search without having a legal pretext to do so, later stated that while they understood that the search may have been illegal, they felt that the results of their choices (finding and seizing the drugs) would outweigh any potential unlawfulness. These results show that not all participants came to other ideas after consulting and discussion with their colleagues about the chosen options in the 360° film VR.

Based on the feedback, and the fact that everyone actively participated and several participants spoke very detailed about their observations and considerations, the dialogues were generally perceived as safe. Some participants, in addition, stressed that they liked the way that the conversations were structured, with in particular the focus on skills and craftsmanship, without judgmental language.

4 Discussion

4.1 Proof of concept

This paper describes the various steps taken in the development of a prototype of a training that aims to stimulate dialogues among police officers about ethnic profiling. Based on the discussed theory and observations, it can be argued that the combination of experiential, social and affective learning can help to create an enjoyable, informative, and psychologically safe learning environment, which can motivate police officers to engage in dialogues and discover potential bias and ineffective practices in day-to-day policing. In addition to these qualitative observations, De Vries et al. (2023) quantitatively assessed the efficacy of the 360° film VR part of the prototype training in an experimental setting by comparing police participants who did the first part of the training in VR, with participants doing this in 2D on a smart phone, and with a control condition in which no training content was administered. The study found that the training variant in 360° film VR was indeed characterized by higher levels of presence, engagement and enjoyment, and also improved officers’ knowhow about the rules and principles to prevent ethnic profiling, as described in the Code of Practice. These findings testify to VR, and 360° film VR, as a powerful tool to professionalize policing. However, the study of De Vries et al. (2023) does not reveal to what extent the dialogue part contributed to the positive effects. Because of the controversial nature of the topic, this is important. Observations of the group dialogue provide evidence that this part does add to reflection and introspection. The fact that half of the participants, who could have opted for fairer decisions, agreed that their decisions could have been better, underscores this.

Hence, the contribution of this study fits within the broader context of research on VR applications for training to reduce implicit bias, as well as behavioral change. More specifically, the results indicate that branching scenarios in 360° film VR can stimulate police officers to engage in dialogues about (racial) biases in police decision-making, while the constructive controversy in the dialogue part can help them build awareness and new insights.

4.2 Limitations and recommendations

In the current design of the prototype, a significant part of the outcome relies on participants’ behavioral choices in the 360° film VR; these decisions are the basis for the subsequent group dialogues. However, these decisions may not always be representative of the behavior conducted by officers in their day-to-day police work. As VR allows us to re-create, improve, and gamify reality in a controlled environment, it may be tempting to increase the use of this technology more for studying behavior. However, 360° film VR options remain limited and do not fully simulate reality, where individuals have more degrees of freedom. Also, participants may be motivated to behave socially-desirable when they understand the subject of the training [preventing ethnic profiling]. Finally, 360° film VR may invite participants to treat it as a game, and despite the high level of realism and instructions from the moderator not to see it as such, they may be tempted to experiment and opt for something different from what they would do in real life.

Some researchers have argued for the similarity between experiences in VR and 360° film VR, compared to real life (e.g., see Kuliga et al., 2015), and thus support the ecological validity of choices made in these virtual environments. We, however, would be hesitant to hold participants accountable for their choices in 360° film VR. Arguably, it could be counterproductive if participants feel the feedback, they receive afterwards is unfair or incorrect, and they may respond defensively. Likely, this could have detrimental effects on the dialogue session. Nevertheless, we believe that participants could still learn about correct and incorrect behavior as defined by the Code of Practice, even when they–just out of curiosity-choose unrealistic options.

Another limitation relates to the role of the moderator. The success of the training heavily relies on the situational context and how moderators take a position in the dialogue. Their involvement can help creating a bridge between the virtual experiences, the legal and ethical principles for conducting proactive police stops, and real-world policing, to ensure that the training results in practical and applicable skills. While there is a script for them to follow, meant to stimulate the exchange of perspectives to reach a higher cognitive state, we cannot rule out they acted differently nor guarantee the quality of their actions. To promote independent, reflective, and critical thinking, moderators need to ask the right questions, at the right moment, and connect the answers to relevant theory and practices (i.e., about implicit bias and prejudices). Some may perform better than others. Also, there is a risk in using in-service police officers as moderators. While their group membership may give them credibility, putting them in a better position to communicate the message of change (or to ‘sell the reform’), being part of the same team could make them also vulnerable. In the event of resistance, moderators may resort to coping behavior, such as avoiding controversial questions and seeking concurrence (Johnson, 2015).

This underscores the importance of investing in a train-the-trainer program, that gives moderators the skills and confidence needed to perform their duty, also under difficult circumstances. Ideally, this trainer for moderators contains elements of nonviolent communication, which is used today to manage polarized conversations between people (Koopman and Seliga, 2021), by fostering empathy and building connections across difference (Horvat and Kuzma-Kachur, 2021; Rosenberg, 2003). Furthermore, the selection of the officers for this role might require further attention, both because it is important to grow a larger pool of moderators when the expanding on the training and to avoid always involving ‘the usual suspects’. For moderators to be convincing, we recommend putting esteemed police officers in this role, who are seen as ‘credible’ among fellow officers (Kochel and Nouri, 2024; Toch, 2008; Wolfe et al., 2020).

Finally, to promote perspective taking, it could help to create more diversity in the selection of participants (in terms of demography and background). Officers with different backgrounds may make different choices in the game and may bring in different perspectives in the dialogue afterwards. Interacting with a diverse range of individuals can also challenge preconceived notions and stereotypes, fostering empathy and leading to more nuanced and informed perceptions of different groups (cf. Pettigrew and Tropp, 2008). We anticipate that these recommendations will increase the overall effect of the training.

4.3 Future research

The current research is solely qualitative and descriptive, which is appropriate for an initial pilot study. As a follow-up, we recommend doing a more comprehensive evaluation of the intervention’s impact on both the short and longer term. This would provide a deeper understanding of the relationships between variables and the significance of observed changes.

Additionally, it is crucial to expand research to include frontline police officers, as the current study’s participants were attendees of an innovation Congress who were not initially aware of the workshop’s focus on ethnic profiling prevention. Their openness to the topic may not accurately reflect the perspectives of officers in operational settings. Future studies should aim to engage this target group to assess the tool’s relevance, usability, and effectiveness in real-world contexts. This approach will enhance the generalizability of the findings and ensure that the intervention is tailored to meet the needs of those it is designed to support.

References

Barbot, B., and Kaufman, J. C. (2020). What makes immersive virtual reality the ultimate empathy machine? Discerning the underlying mechanisms of change. Comput. Hum. Behav. 111, 106431. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106431

Böing, B., de Vries, P. W., and Giebels, E. (2025). Don’t know, don’t care, don’t want, don’t dare: an explorative study into predictors of police officers’ support for reform to prevent ethnic profiling. J. Police Crim. Psychol. doi:10.1007/s11896-025-09749-3

Buttussi, F., and Chittaro, L. (2018). Effects of different types of virtual reality display on presence and learning in a safety training scenario. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 24 (2), 1063–1076. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2017.2653117

Council of Europe (2019). Ethnic profiling: a persisting practice in Europe. Available online at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/commissioner/-/ethnic-profiling-a-persisting-practice-in-europe.

De Maillard, J., Verfaillie, K., and Rowe, M. (2024). The politicization of police stops in Europe: public issues and police reform (Palgrave Macmillan).

De Vries, P. W., Böing, B., Mulder, E., and van Gelder, J. L. (2023). “Sugarcoating a bitter pill – VR against police ethnic profiling,” in Persuasive technology: 18th international conference, PERSUASIVE 2023, eindhoven, The Netherlands, april 19–21, 2023, proceedings. Editors A. Meschtscherjakov, C. Midden, and J. Ham (Cham: Springer), 22–35. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-30933-5_2

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan Company.

Downing, V. R., Cooper, K. M., Cala, J. M., Gin, L. E., and Brownell, S. E. (2020). Fear of negative evaluation and student anxiety in community college active-learning science courses. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 19 (2), 20. doi:10.1187/cbe.19-09-0186

Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adm. Sci. Q. 44 (2), 350–383. doi:10.2307/2666999

Engel, R. S., McManus, H. D., and Isaza, G. T. (2020). Moving beyond “best practice”: experiences in police reform and a call for evidence to reduce officer-involved shootings. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 687 (1), 146–165. doi:10.1177/0002716219889328

Fox, J., Arena, D., and Bailenson, J. N. (2009). Virtual reality: a survival guide for the social scientist. J. Media Psychol. 21 (3), 95–113. doi:10.1027/1864-1105.21.3.95

FRA (2017). Second European union minorities and discrimination survey muslims. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

FRA (2019). Being black in the EU: second European union minorities and discrimination survey. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Fridell, L., and Böing, B. (2023). Maximizing the impact of implicit bias training. Police Chief 90 (10), 54–57. Available online at: https://www.policechiefmagazine.org/maximizing-the-impact-of-implicit-bias-training/?ref=9d5272107ad7b6c62137714ba2ad4986.

Fromm, J., Radianti, J., Wehking, C., Stieglitz, S., Majchrzak, T. A., and vom Brocke, J. (2021). More than experience? – on the unique opportunities of virtual reality to afford a holistic experiential learning cycle. Internet High. Educ. 50, 100804. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100804

Green, P., Kolb, A., Kolb, D., and Kuh, G. (2024). “Defining Experiential Education: the field’s seminal thinkers take stock and look ahead,” in Experiential learning and teaching in higher education, 7.1

Griffin, N. S. (2020). #Notallcops: exploring “Rotten Apple” narratives in media reporting of Lush’s 2018 “Spycops” undercover policing campaign. Int. J. Crime, Justice Soc. Democr. 9 (1), 177–194. doi:10.5204/IJCJSD.V9I4.1518

Groom, V., Bailenson, J. N., and Nass, C. (2009). The influence of racial embodiment on racial bias in immersive virtual environments. Soc. Influ. 4 (3), 231–248. doi:10.1080/15534510802643750

Horvat, M. V., and Kuzma-Kachur, M. I. (2021). Professional activity of an elementary school teacher with students of the alpha generation. Sci. Bull. Mukachevo State Univ. Ser. “Pedagogy Psychol. 7 (1), 26–35. doi:10.52534/msu-pp.7(1).2021.26-35

Hube, N., Reinelt, M., Vidackovic, K., and Sedlmair, M. (2024). A study on the influence of situations on personal avatar characteristics. Vis. Comput. Industry, Biomed. Art 7 (1), 23. doi:10.1186/s42492-024-00174-7

Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Myhill, A., Quinton, P., and Tyler, T. R. (2012). Why do people comply with the law? Br. J. Criminol. 52 (6), 1051–1071. doi:10.1093/bjc/azs032

Johnson, D. (2015). Constructive controversy: theory, research, practice. Cambridge University Press.

Kahneman, D. (2011). “Thinking, fast and slow,” in Thinking, fast and slow (London: Penguin Books).

Kleijer-Kool, L., and Landman, W. (2016). ‘Boeven vangen’: Het spel tussen politieagenten en de Ander. Tijdschrift over Cultuur and Crim. 6 (1), 42–65. doi:10.5553/tcc/221195072016006001004

Kochel, T. R., and Nouri, S. (2024). Impact of in-service implicit bias training: a study of attitudinal changes and intention to apply anti-bias techniques. Police Q. 27 (4), 561–581. doi:10.1177/10986111241237512

Kolb, A. Y., and Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ. 4 (2), 193–212. doi:10.5465/AMLE.2005.17268566

Koopman, S., and Seliga, L. (2021). Teaching peace by using nonviolent communication for difficult conversations in the college classroom. Peace Confl. Stud. 27 (3), 1–29. doi:10.46743/1082-7307/2021.1692

Kuliga, S. F., Thrash, T., Dalton, R. C., and Hölscher, C. (2015). Virtual reality as an empirical research tool – exploring user experience in a real building and a corresponding virtual model. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 54, 363–375. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.09.006

Lai, C. K., and Lisnek, J. A. (2023). The impact of implicit-bias-oriented diversity training on police officers’ beliefs, motivations, and actions. Psychol. Sci. 34 (4), 424–434. doi:10.1177/09567976221150617

Lotteraner, L., Hofmann, T., and Moller, T. (2023). The challenge of interdisciplinarity at the intersection of groundwater management and visualization research. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 43 (6), 50–63. doi:10.1109/MCG.2023.3309090

Louis, L. B. (2024). Towards better policing: achieving norm internalization and compliance with persuasively designed technology. Meijers-reeks.

Martirosov, S., and Kopecek, P. (2017). “Virtual reality and its influence on training and education – literature review,” in Annals of DAAAM and proceedings of the international DAAAM symposium, 100, 708–717. doi:10.2507/28th.daaam.proceedings

Meeteren, M. van, Woude, M. van der, Mutsaers, P., Vries, I. de, Hageman, N., Leun, J. van der, et al. (2023). Etnisch profileren door de politie [ethnic profilign by the police]. Rotterdam: Radboud Universiteit. Available online at: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12832/3347.

Muñoz, J. E., Lavoie, J. A., and Pope, A. T. (2024). Psychophysiological insights and user perspectives: enhancing police de-escalation skills through full-body VR training. Front. Psychol. 15, 1390677. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1390677

Narrillos, E. (2020). Parliament condemns all forms of racism, hate and violence and calls for action.

Nix, J., and Wolfe, S. E. (2017). The impact of negative publicity on police self-legitimacy. Justice Q. 34 (1), 84–108. doi:10.1080/07418825.2015.1102954

Peck, T. C., Seinfeld, S., Aglioti, S. M., and Slater, M. (2013). Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias. Conscious. Cognition 22 (3), 779–787. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.016

Pettigrew, T. F., and Tropp, L. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediatorsy. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 38 (6), 922–934. doi:10.1002/ejsp.504

Pierson, E., Simoiu, C., Overgoor, J., Corbett-Davies, S., Jenson, D., Shoemaker, A., et al. (2020). A large-scale analysis of racial disparities in police stops across the United States. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4 (7), 736–745. doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0858-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Police Chief (2022). The IACP trust building campaign. Police Chief Mag., 6–7. Available online at: https://www.policechiefmagazine.org/presidents-message-iacp-trust-building-campaign/?ref=bb30b3004b95f3083974001cdd9ae950

Roboh, A. G. P., and Tedjaatmadja, H. M. (2016). Affective strategies used by high proficiency learners at hand fortuna center. Kata Kita 4 (2). doi:10.9744/katakita.4.2.80-85

Rosenberg, M. B. (2003). Life-enriching education: nonviolent communication helps schools improve performance, reduce conflict, and enhance relationships. Encinitas: PuddleDancer Press.

Ruan, S., Yuan, R., Guan, Q., Lin, Y., Mao, Y., Jiang, W., et al. (2023). VENUS: a geometrical representation for quantum state visualization. Comput. Graph. Forum 42 (3), 247–258. doi:10.1111/cgf.14827

Sedlmair, M., Meyer, M., and Munzner, T. (2012). Design study methodology: reflections from the trenches and the stacks. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 18 (12), 2431–2440. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2012.213

Sharar, S. R., Alamdari, A., Hoffer, C., Hoffman, H. G., Jensen, M. P., and Patterson, D. R. (2016). Circumplex model of affect: a measure of pleasure and arousal during virtual reality distraction analgesia. Games Health J. 5 (3), 197–202. doi:10.1089/g4h.2015.0046

Shiner, M. (2010). Post-Lawrence policing in england and wales: guilt, innocence and the defence of organizational ego. Br. J. Criminol. 50 (5), 935–953. doi:10.1093/bjc/azq027

Skogan, W. G. (2008). Why reforms fail. Polic. Soc. 18 (1), 23–34. doi:10.1080/10439460701718534

Tajfel, H., and Turner, J. C. (1985). “The social identity theory of intergroup behavior,” in Psychology of intergroup relations. Editors S. Worchel,, and W. G. Austin 2nd ed. (Chicago: Nelson-Hall), 7–24.

Tassinari, M., Aulbach, M. B., and Jasinskaja-Lahti, I. (2022). The use of virtual reality in studying prejudice and its reduction: a systematic review. PLOS ONE 17 (7), e0270748. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0270748

Toch, H. (2008). Police officers as change agents in police reform. Polic. Soc. 18 (1), 60–71. doi:10.1080/10439460701718575

Tyler, T. R. (2004). Enhancing police legitimacy. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 593 (1), 84–99. doi:10.1177/0002716203262627

Tyler, T. R., and Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality Soc. Psychol. Rev. 7 (4), 349–361. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_07

Tyler, T. R., and Wakslak, C. J. (2004). Profiling and police legitimacy: procedural justice, attributions of motive, and acceptance of police authority. Criminology 42 (2), 253–282. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00520.x

Van Den Brandt, A., Jonkheer, E. M., Van Workum, D. J. M., Van De Wetering, H., Smit, S., and Vilanova, A. (2024). PanVA: pangenomic variant analysis. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 30 (8), 4895–4909. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2023.3282364

Vitriol, J. A., Banaji, M. R., and Lowe, R. (2024). Change in attitudes and beliefs about implicit bias education: a demonstration among members of a police department. Philos. Psychol. 37 (6), 1539–1571. doi:10.1080/09515089.2023.2296585

Wiebe, E. N., Lamb, A., Hardy, M., and Sharek, D. (2014). Measuring engagement in video game-based environments: investigation of the user engagement scale. Comput. Hum. Behav. 32, 123–132. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.001

Witmer, B. G., and Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 7 (3), 225–240. doi:10.1162/105474698565686

Wolfe, S., Rojek, J., McLean, K., and Alpert, G. (2020). Social interaction training to reduce police use of force. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 687 (1), 124–145. doi:10.1177/0002716219887366

Worden, R., McLean, S., Engel, R., Cochran, H., Corsaro, N., Reynolds, D., et al. (2020). The impacts of implicit bias awareness training in the NYPD. Int. Assoc. Chiefs Police (IACP). Available online at: https://www.theiacp.org/research.

Worden, R. E., Najdowski, C. J., McLean, S. J., Worden, K. M., Corsaro, N., Cochran, H., et al. (2024). Implicit bias training for police: evaluating impacts on enforcement disparities. Law Hum. Behav. 48 (5-6), 338–355. doi:10.1037/lhb0000568

Xie, B., Liu, H., Alghofaili, R., Zhang, Y., Jiang, Y., Lobo, F. D., et al. (2021). A review on virtual reality skill training applications. Front. Virtual Real. 2. doi:10.3389/frvir.2021.645153

Copyright © 2025 Böing, De Vries and Giebels. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Source and full text with figures

“This grant represents an important step forward in our commitment to compassionate, informed, and effective policing,” said Chief John D. Souza. “Through innovative training and collaboration, we can better serve our community and prepare for the complex challenges officers face today.”

The UMass Dartmouth Police Department recognizes the importance of equipping officers with the skills needed to effectively manage situations involving individuals in crisis or those posing active threats to the campus community. Through immersive, scenario-based VR simulations, officers will gain hands-on experience in responding to unpredictable, high-stress encounters with empathy, professionalism, and sound judgment.

By integrating this cutting-edge technology into its training program, the department aims to strengthen officer readiness further, ensure the safety of the campus community, and foster greater trust between law enforcement and those they serve.

The UMass Dartmouth Police Department also plans to collaborate with neighboring law enforcement agencies to extend the benefits of this training beyond campus. By sharing resources and expertise, local departments can collectively enhance public safety and improve crisis intervention practices throughout the region.

In addition to law enforcement training, Chief John Souza envisions opportunities for broader community engagement. The department plans to introduce this technology to Crime and Justice Studies students, members of the Student Government Association, and participants in a future Citizens’ Police Academy. These initiatives will provide valuable experiential learning opportunities and promote mutual understanding between the police department and the campus community.

Source, text and photo